Legal Opinion

Ball Bearing Co. v. Star Ball Retainer Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 6, 1906No. 26Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill in equity, in which the appellant charged the appellee with infringement -of two patents belonging to the appellant, viz., patents No. 449,968 and No. 449,959, both dated April 7, 1891, -and issued to George F. Simonds, for “Improvements in ball-bearings.”

The claims of patent No. 449,968 are as follows:

“(1) An annular ball-retaining cage consisting of-a tubular body baviug a central opening to receive a central support and provided with flanges having lateral openings that surround the central 'opening, in combination…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Ball Bearing Co. v. Star Ball Retainer Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API