Legal Opinion

State v. Shoemaker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1986No. 8522SC931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial, on its own motion, after improper and prejudicial remarks by the prosecutor. During the trial, the prosecutor made attempts to link defendant and his attorneys with illegal gambling which had been taking place at the scene of the shootings by use of a video poker machine. The prosecutor, at various times, referred to one of defendant’s attorneys as “that video lawyer.” Also, during the direct examination of defendant by his attorneys, the prosecutor interrupted more…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. CornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. McCraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. HammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SextonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. DewberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. EverettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API