Legal Opinion
Martin Epstein Co. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas L. J. Corcoran, J.
This is a motion for an injunction
pendente lite brought by the petitioner in a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. The respondents cross-move to dismiss the petition on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to entitle the petitioner to any relief.
The petition alleges the following: On May 17, 1950, the respondent, the City of New York, acting through its Department of Public Works, opened bids for an electrical contract, designated officially as “ PW 55 Bockaway Sewage Treatment Works Contract No. 4 — Electrical Work”. The petitioner’s bid was the lowest. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Picone v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Pagano Realty Corp. v. O'DwyerNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Rivkin v. Garbros Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1944
- J. D. L. Corp. v. BruckmanNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Syracuse Intercepting Sewer Board v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Litemore Electric Co. v. KaweckiNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Kayfield Construction Corp. v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc. v. McFaddenNew York Supreme Court · 1965