Legal Opinion
Syracuse Intercepting Sewer Board v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
The Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland gave a $50,000 bond to insure the faithful performance of a contract which the Alto Construction Company made with the Syracuse Intercepting Sewer Board to finish and complete the improvement of Onondaga creek, in the city of Syracuse. By chapter 2 of the Laws of 1798, p. 296, re-enacted by chapter 186 of the Laws of 1801, section 34, and chapter 47 of the Revised Laws of 1813 (Vol. 2, p.'285), Onondaga creek was declared to be a public highway. The Syracuse Intercepting Sewer Board was created by chapter 356 of the Laws of 1907, with power to…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore v. DeLuca-Davis Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Haskell-Gilroy, Inc. v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- J. N. Futia Co. v. Office of General ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- North Country Development Corp. v. Massena Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Kniska v. SplainNew York Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.