Legal Opinion

Barasky v. Shoemaker

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 2021No. 1:20-cv-02457Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY BARASKY, : Plaintiff : : No. 1:20-cv-2457 v. : : (Judge Rambo) BRAD SHOEMAKER, et al., : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Presently before the Court are the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 20) filed by Defendants Brad Shoemaker (“Shoemaker”), Ryan Barnes (“Barnes”), and Chris Ebner (“Ebner”), as well as the motion to compel (Doc. No. 24) filed by pro se Plaintiff Anthony Barasky (“Plaintiff”). The motions are fully briefed and ripe for disposition. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff , who is currently incarcerated at the Lycoming…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API