Legal Opinion

Latrobe Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1983No. Appeal No. 3166 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

Petitioner, Latrobe Steel Company, appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s award of benefits to Respondent, Harry Goodman, on the basis of Respondent’s complete loss of hearing.1

Respondent was employed by Petitioner for thirty-nine years during which time he developed a hearing loss as a result of his constant exposure to high levels of machinery-related noise. Respondent filed a petition with the Bureau of Worker’s Compensation, and, after a hearing, the referee found that Respondent *205had suffered a complete…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Elliot v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Winkelman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Marshall v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Armco, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Babcock & Wilcox & Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Cooper Energy Services v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API