Legal Opinion

Pike Countryside Annexation v. Vernal City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1985No. 19210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice.

The appellant is Ashley Valley Water & Sewer Improvement District (“Ashley Valley”); the respondent is the City of Vernal. Ashley Valley brought this action before a local boundary commission to protest Vernal’s annexation of several areas within Ashley Valley. The boundary commission upheld the annexation, and Ashley Valley appealed to the district court. The district court dismissed Ashley Valley’s appeal for lack of standing. We reverse and remand.

Ashley Valley was organized in 1974 to provide water and sewer service to people residing outside of Vernal. To this end,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sweetwater Properties v. Town of AltaUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Sweetwater Properties v. Town of AltaUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Paulsen v. Hooper Water Improvement DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doit, Inc. v. Touche, Ross & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. MESA DEVELOPMENT CO. v. Sandy City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  3. Szatkowski v. Bountiful CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  4. Doit, Inc. v. Touche, Ross & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. West Bountiful City v. Woods Cross CityUtah Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API