Paulsen v. Hooper Water Improvement District

DURHAM, Justice:

In this action, the defendant below, Hooper Water Improvement District, sought to prevent the withdrawal of the plaintiffs’ property from the defendant’s district on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to comply with the requirements of U.C.A., 1953, § 17-6-29. After hearing the evidence, the trial court found against the defendant and granted the plaintiffs’ petition to withdraw. The defendant now appeals that decision. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On November 20, 1979, Roy City properly adopted a “Master” Policy Declaration for annexation in general. In…