Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Crist

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 26, 1956No. 13Published

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, J.:

Appellant started suit before a Justice of the Peace for damage to her automobile as a result of an accident. Before the institution of suit she filed a statement of facts as required by Title 10 Del. C. § 9611(a). The statement was signed by her attorney in the case and not by plaintiff personally. Appellees not appearing at the trial, judgment by default was entered in favor of appellant against appellees. Appellees filed a praecipe for a writ of certiorari to the Superior Court, stating as their sole exception to the judgment the fact that the statement of facts was signed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nigro v. FlinnSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  2. Beatty v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. State v. FlemingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Howell v. EastburnSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API