Legal Opinion

Mannella v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1939No. Appeal, 80PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

Mike Mannella, plaintiff, entered into a written contract with the City of Pittsburgh, defendant, to lay a 36-inch waterpipe servicing the South Side district. To the extent of about 800 feet the line was to rest in a trench at the bottom of, and crossing, the Monongahela River. The work proceeded satisfactorily until the laying of the pipe under the river had been finished. In order to permit of an inspection the pipe was then partially drained by a siphoning operation, during the course of which it floated, buckled at the flanges, and broke. This made necessary a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Filbert v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Canuso v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Sailor v. HertzoggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  4. Rabinowitz v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Iron Clad Manufacturing Co. v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Rochester MacHine Corp. v. Mulach Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Sandy Hites Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Mayor of Columbus v. Clark-Dietz & Associates-Engineers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API