Legal Opinion

United States v. Manfredi

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 17, 1978No. 72 Cr. 810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

This is the not unusual situation where a defendant who pled guilty and testified as a government witness recants his trial testimony against a codefendant who was convicted. As is often the case, the recantation occurs only after the statute of limitations on perjury bars any prosecution based upon his trial testimony.

Based upon the recantation, the convicted defendant, Joseph Manfredi, now moves, more than five years after his conviction following a month long trial, “to set aside the verdict” on the ground that the prosecution knowingly used perjured…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Joseph ManfrediCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. Edward W. Newfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. B. H. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wright v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1983
  2. Costanzo v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Beatty v. SnowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API