Legal Opinion

Bolt v. Muskegon Board of County Road Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1936No. Docket No. 56, Calendar No. 39,014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The defendant board of county road commissioners in August, 1935, was the owner pi five trucks and was contemplating the purchase of five new ones. Consequently, on August 29 and 31, 1935, it advertised for proposals by inserting the following in the Muskegon Chronicle:

“Proposals wanted
“Sealed proposals will he received by the hoard of county road commissioners of Muskegon county in their offices at 953 Keating avenue, Muskegon, Mich., until 10 a. m., Tuesday, Sept. 3, 1935, for 5 1%-ton dump trucks with dual rear wheels. Further information may he attained at the above named offices. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leavy v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Berghage v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Malan Construction Corp. v. Board of County Road CommissionersDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1960
  2. J J Zayti Trucking, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API