Legal Opinion

Hill v. Xerox Corporation

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 21, 2025No. 2:12-cv-00717Unknown

1Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 TIFFANY HILL, individually and on CASE NO. C12-0717-JCC behalf of all persons similarly situated, 10 ORDER 11 Plaintiff, v. 12 XEROX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC, et 13 al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment 17 (Dkt. Nos. 240, 244) and motions to exclude expert testimony (Dkt. Nos. 241, 244).1 Having 18 thoroughly considered the briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument 19 unnecessary2…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API