Legal Opinion

Klepper v. Klepper

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1928No. 2804PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

Plaintiff instituted her suit for a divorce. An affidavit of nonresidence of the defendant having been made, a copy of the summons was served upon him personally in a sister state. Before the time within which to plead had expired the defendant appeared specially and moved to quash the summons and the service thereof, on jurisdictional grounds. The motion to quash having been heard and denied, and no request having been made by the defendant for time within which to plead, the court ordered that defendant’s default bé entered. The court then immediately…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fowler v. MooreNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Tiedemann v. TiedemannNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Paul v. ArmstrongNevada Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Martin v. District Court of the First DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Potter v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartford Mining Co. v. Home Lumber & Coal Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1940
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Tax Commission v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Saroff v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Hanley v. ToblerNevada Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API