City of Los Angeles v. Eighth Judicial District Court
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] It would be an anomaly indeed if a court not having jurisdiction could acquire it by granting an extension of time on its own motion. Such a rule would be as illogical as holding that by erroneously denying a motion to quash service the court could acquire jurisdiction. Such, of course, is not the rule. Pacific States, etc. v.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cloud v. Inhabitants of the Town of Pierce CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- St. Louis, Kennett & Southern Railroad v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abell v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Public Service Commission v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1942
- Jahn v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Young Electric Sign Co. v. Erwin Electric Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Mitchell v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.