Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1937No. 3187PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] It would be an anomaly indeed if a court not having jurisdiction could acquire it by granting an extension of time on its own motion. Such a rule would be as illogical as holding that by erroneously denying a motion to quash service the court could acquire jurisdiction. Such, of course, is not the rule. Pacific States, etc. v.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cloud v. Inhabitants of the Town of Pierce CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. St. Louis, Kennett & Southern Railroad v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Abell v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Public Service Commission v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Jahn v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Young Electric Sign Co. v. Erwin Electric Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Mitchell v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API