Legal Opinion

American Family Insurance Co. v. Barnett

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1991No. 90CA572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.

Defendants, Gail F. and Gary Barnett, seek review of a declaratory judgment which held that the limit of payable benefits clause in their automobile insurance policy was valid and was properly applied to deduct, as collateral source payments, the payments they received from Social Security disability insurance. We affirm.

Defendants first argue that the collateral source limitation contained in § 13-21-111.6, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Yol. 6A) is unconstitutional in that it applies retroactively to reduce existing substantive rights, impairs contractual rights in violation of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kral v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Newton v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. EkstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Alliance Mutual Casualty Company v. DuersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnett v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Barnett v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API