Legal Opinion

Tingle v. Harvill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 19, 1972No. 46681PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

In the order dealing with the disqualification motion it is stated that "the court having ruled that the motion to dismiss the appeal, as filed by the appellee, be overruled and that the appeal proceed to trial before a jury, therefore, denies the motion and leaves to the trial judge who presides over the trial of this case the question of whether said attorney should be disqualified from proceeding with his representation of the appellee.” (Emphasis supplied.)

In view of the terms of this order dealing with the question of disqualification, it would be inappropriate for this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ensign v. FaxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Morgan v. WoodsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Pardue Medicine Co. Inc. v. PardueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Moore v. City of WinderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Freemon v. DubrocaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Tingle v. Arnold, Cate & AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Hourin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  5. Thorpe v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API