Legal Opinion
Costanzo v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided February 16, 1955No. Claim No. 30968; Claim No. 30969; Claim No. 30970; Claim No. 30971; Claim No. 30972; Claim No. 30973PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
Claimants are the owners of parcels of mucklands lying northwest of the village of Canastota in the town of Lenox, Madison County, New York and hounded generally on the east by Hardwood Island road, on the south by Indian Opening road, on the west-northwest by Tackabury road, which is practically a continuation, at an angle, of Indian Opening road, and on the north by Cowaselon Creek which is paralleled by Ditch Bank road. All of the lands are flat and lie within a contour line of 390 feet above sea level. The muckland area was developed for its particular kind of agriculture as part of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Radcliff's Executors v. . Mayor, C. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Barkley v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Lynch v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Fox v. City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Anchor Brewing Co. v. Village of Dobbs FerryNew York Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Strickland v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
- Rinaldi v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956