In Re Cate
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner, an attorney at law, licensed to practice in the state of California, was disbarred by judgment entered in the superior court of the county of Los Angeles on the twenty-seventh day of May, 1918. The offenses of which he was found guilty were of the character described in subdivision 5 of section 287 of the Code of Civil Procedure. He now applies for reinstatement, claiming that he is now and for a long time has been repentant for the wrongs committed by him and has lived an upright life since the time of his disbarment. The application is supported by the request of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In Re CateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- In Re O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Matter of CateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925