Legal Opinion
Gibson v. Easley
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1934No. Civ. No. 9112PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiffs O. B. Gibson and Nell Gibson, his wife, commenced an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by them in an automobile accident while they were riding as the guests of the defendant Mame C. Easley and Richard Easley, her husband. The action was tried before the trial court-sitting with a jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendant has appealed.
At about 3:30 A. M. on the eighth day of May, 1932, the defendant and her husband called at the residence of the plaintiffs, awakened them and induced them to accompany them on an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Esrey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. NowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ellis v. JewettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- McDonell v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Horning v. GerlachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Miller v. Dollar Steamship Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.