Legal Opinion
Hartnett v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 23, 1998No. 1:98-cr-00656PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLEESON, District Judge.
Plaintiff John J. Hartnett brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review a final determination of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”), denying him disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. The defendant has moved for a remand, acknowledging that the Administrative Law Judge may have improperly rejected the opinion of plaintiffs treating physician. Plaintiff has moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) for judgment on the pleadings directing an award of benefits.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Patrick Balsamo v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Dioguardi v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- Sutherland v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Hall v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Pronti v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.