Legal Opinion
Dioguardi v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 11, 2006No. 04-CV-6237LPublishedCited by 160 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that Darcia S. DioGuardi (“plaintiff’) is not disabled under the Social Security Act (“the Act”) and, therefore, is not entitled to Disability Insurance Benefits. The Commissioner moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), and seeks an affirmance of her final decision. (Dkt.# 3). Plaintiff also moves for judgment on the pleadings but seeks reversal of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Saxon v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Conlin v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
- Montanez v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- SOLSBEE v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Adamczyk, Sr. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.