Bell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Alfonzo Bell was indicted and convicted for the murder of his common law wife, Maxine Bush. He was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment. On appeal from that conviction, Bell's only argument is the claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. While "[t]he claim of `ineffective assistance of counsel' has become a sort of `canned' claim which appears in practically every post-conviction claim," Exparte Boatwright, 471 So.2d 1257, 1259 (Ala. 1985) (Maddox, J., concurring specially), this case is unique in that trial counsel testified to his own ineffectiveness.
George Jones,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ex Parte BoatwrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Baugh v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Borok v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waldrop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Malady v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ex Parte BellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987