Legal Opinion

People v. Duncan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1980No. Docket 78-1815PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants were found guilty by a jury of conspiracy to do a legal act in an illegal *616manner, MCL 750.157a; MSA 28.354(1), and solicitation of a bribe, MCL 750.505; MSA 28.773. Their convictions were affirmed by this Court, 55 Mich App 403; 222 NW2d 261 (1974), and by the Supreme Court, 402 Mich 1; 260 NW2d 58 (1977). A delayed motion for a new trial was filed in the trial court based on a claim of newly discovered evidence. The trial court denied defendants’ motion for a new trial.

The chief prosecution witness, Bettye Harris, was held in protective custody by the City of Inkster during the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. AkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. DuncanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. HowardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. GrissomMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. JanssonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. MacKMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. SommaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. NewhouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API