Legal Opinion
United States v. Ursini
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 13, 1968No. Crim. 11972PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Chief Judge.
Defendant Louis M. Ursini, Jr. has filed his fourth motion for reduction of sentence, pursuant to Rule 35, Fed.R. Crim.P. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
Normally it is not incumbent upon the Court to state its reasons for denying a motion for reduction of sentence. In view of the circumstances under which the instant motion has been made, however, and in view of the substantial sentence involved, a brief statement of the Court’s reasons for denying the motion would appear to be appropriate.
There is a threshold question, noticed by the Court sua sponte,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Richard Anthony CapaldoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Enrique Reyes Leyvas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Frank Leslie Dodge v. James v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Felix Francis KoneskiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Anthony DecologeroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Ersel StollingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Alfred B. Diggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Lawrence Janiec, in No. 74-1281 Appeal of Samuel Laytham, in No. 74-1282Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.