Legal Opinion

Franklin Process Co. v. Hoosac Mills Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 19, 1934No. 3926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The receivers of the Hoosae Mills Corporation have presented to this court a report on a claim of the United States for $81,694.28, representing a balance due on the processing and floor stock taxes assessed pursuant to sections 9 and 16 of the Act of May 12,1933 (7 USCA §§ 609, 616), known as the Agricultural Adjustment Act. The receivers recommended that this claim be disallowed, and ask that the report be approved.

The report brings into question the validity of the tax. The matter was heard on evidence submitted by the government, oral arguments, and briefs. The…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Baker v. GFC Corp. (In Re Baker)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
  3. State v. TafoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In re Royal-Wilhelm Furniture Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1938
  5. Rieder v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API