Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Godwin

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 15, 1973PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTIE, Judge.

This is a tort action in which the plaintiffs, Paul A. Murphy, Jr., and his wife, Jane, seek to recover damages which they say occurred as a result of the wrongful conduct of the defendant, Dr. Francis W. Godwin. The suit centers about the failure of Dr. Godwin to return promptly to the New York Life Insurance Company an attending physician’s statement required by the company as a prerequisite to its underwriting a health insurance policy for the Murphys. The plaintiffs say that as a result of Dr. Godwin’s failure to promptly return the form after it had been indicated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ebersole v. LowengrubSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  2. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  3. ALEXANDER v. KnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Continental Oil Company v. Pauley Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  5. Phillips v. Delaware Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. El Paso Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  2. Tanzer v. International General Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
  3. Doe 30's Mother v. BradleySuperior Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. Craig v. A.A.R. Realty Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Ahnert v. WildmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API