Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Yegelwel & Jaguar Cars, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1990Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard F. McCaffrey
Petitioner’s application to vacate an October 12, 1989 arbitrator’s decision issued October 20, 1989, is determined as hereinafter provided.
On September 13, 1989, petitioner filed a request for arbitration with the Attorney-General’s office pursuant to General Business Law § 198-a (New Car Lemon Law). Thereafter, on October 12, 1989, an arbitration hearing was held before the *663appointed arbitrator, Alfred Udow, who rendered a written decision on a form prescribed by the administrator (13 NYCRR 300.17 [a]) immediately upon its conclusion. Essentially, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Raisler Corp. & New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Kingsley v. Redevco Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Arbitration between Langston Enterprises, Inc. & Diamond Rug & Carpet Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Kingsley v. Redevco Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983