Daegling v. Strauss
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Lake Circuit Court; Wm. J. Whihery, Special Judge. Action by Maurice T. Strauss and others against Prank Zawadski and others. From the judgment rendered, Fernando W. Daegling and another appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.
The appellees, other than Simon Kalish, move the court to dismiss this appeal, and in substance allege: (1) that the court has acquired no jurisdiction of the appeal to decide the merits of the case because “there is no final judgment against the defendants to the cross-complaint, Sarah Strauss, Mark Hershberg, Flora Strauss, Morris Alexander, Belle Strauss, Simon Kalish,-Kalish, his wife * * * May Kalish, wife of Otto Kalish and Marie Kalish; (2) because the above named persons are parties to the judgment adverse to the appellants, being defendants to appellants’ cross-complaint and as such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. GravesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Keller v. JordanIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Wehmeier v. Mercantile Banking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Crow v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beam v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Wayne Sewer & Drain Co. v. Ward Cowen Constraction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Faylor v. KoontzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- State ex rel. Horall v. JacobsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Brown v. Nat. Life Ins. Co. of Wash. Co. Vt.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.