Walter v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
Appellant Eric Lamont Walter files this interlocutory appeal based on the refusal of the circuit court to transfer this matter to juvenile court for treatment as a delinquency case. His argument on appeal is that he did not employ violence in the offenses alleged against him and, as a consequence, he should be transferred to juvenile court under the Blevins v. State rationale that his offenses are serious ones but not violent in nature. See Blevins v. State, 308 Ark. 613, 826 S.W.2d 265 (1992). We disagree, and we affirm the decision of the circuit court.
The facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Vickers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Ashing v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Guy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.