Legal Opinion
Rudacille v. State Commission on Conservation & Development
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 15, 1931PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
By an act of the General Assembly, approved March 17, \ 1926, Acts 1926, pa^e 307, there was created “as an agency of the Commonwealth,” a body corporate under the style of “State Commission on Conservation and Development.” That Commission was vested with the power of eminent domain, and was directed to report to the Governor some *813practical plan looking to the establishment of a public park within the Blue Ridge Mountain area of this State.
By Act of Congress of May 22, 1926 (16 U. S. C. A. sections 403 to 403c), provisions were made for acceptance by the Federal government of title to lands…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Peyton v. KingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
- Saunders v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro v. HaginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- City of Richmond v. DervishianSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- State v. Core Banks Club Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.