Legal Opinion

James River Hydrate and Supply Company, Incorporated v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1964No. 9433_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

In this action for a refund of income' taxes paid, the question is whether the-product of the plaintiff’s quarry is-“metallurgical grade limestone” within; the meaning of § 114(b) (4) (A) (iii)> of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 and thus entitled to a fifteen per cent depletion rate. 1 The District Court in a comprehensive opiixion held that it was. 2 We affirm for the reasons stated by the District Judge and need add little here to what was there said.

The product of the plaintiff’s quarry is. dolomite of a very high grade and quality. It consists of something…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James River Hydrate & Supply Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The National Lime & Stone Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  2. Thomas v. Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API