Legal Opinion

James River Hydrate & Supply Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided September 25, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 1175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHIE, District Judge.

This case involves the question whether the plaintiff (hereinafter usually called ■“James River”) is entitled to a 15% rate of depletion on stone quarried and sold from its plant on the James River about one mile east of Buchanan, Virginia, or should be limited, as the United States of America (sometimes hereinafter called the “Government”) contends, to a 10% rate.

Since only the taxable years 1952 and 1953 are involved in this proceeding, the issue turns on the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, as amended, and, more particularly, upon the correct interpretation of § 114(b)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halquist v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  2. The Erie Stone Company v. United States of America, Toledo Stone & Glass Sand Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  3. Vulcan Materials Company v. Ernest J. Sauber, District Director of Internal Revenue, and D. J. Luippold, Acting District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  4. Erie Stone Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James River Hydrate and Supply Company, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. Thomas v. Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API