Legal Opinion

Helms v. Monsanto Co.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided November 29, 1982No. CV 82-L-5141-NEPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

LYNNE, Senior District Judge.

This is an action by Clark Ray Helms for Declaratory Judgment claiming that defendant, Monsanto Company, Helms’ employer, wrongfully denied him total and permanent disability benefits. The disability benefits plaintiff seeks are provided by Monsanto Company’s Disability Income Plan (“DIP”). DIP is an employee welfare benefit plan as defined in Section 3(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. 1002(1). Thus, the provisions of ERISA control this case.

DIP provides benefits to Monsanto employees who are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fentron Industries, Inc. v. The National Shopmen Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Ruetta Paris, Mildred Cawthon and Marge Kane v. Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Howard B. Wolf, Inc. And Eugene K. FriesenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Everett Bueneman v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. Taylor v. Bakery & Confectionary Union & Industry International Welfare FundDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1978
  5. Blackmar v. LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark Ray Helms and Betty Helms v. Monsanto Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Payne v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting IndustriesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
  3. United States v. TomDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API