Legal Opinion
Concerned Parents v. Housing Auth. of St. Petersburg
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 6, 1996No. 95-1719-CIV-T-25(C)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED ORDER
ADAMS, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Disqualify Holland & Knight as counsel for Plaintiffs (Dkt. 14) and Plaintiffs’ response (Dkt. 28). For the following reasons, the Court determines that the motion should be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs allege that Defendant maintains public housing units contaminated with lead based paint which have caused and continue to cause injury to numerous children who reside there. The law firm of Holland & Knight through its Community Services Team and Gulf Coast Legal Services have undertaken to represent residents of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Russell HobsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. KAWSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- MMR/Wallace Power & Industrial, Inc. v. Thames AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Olson v. Snap Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Palmer v. Pioneer Hotel & CasinoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1998
- Key Largo Restaurant, Inc. v. TH Old Town Associates, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Florida, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
- Armor Screen Corp. v. Storm Catcher, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.