Legal Opinion
Bridges v. 725 Riverside Drive, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 28, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover brokerage commissions, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jiudice, J.), dated May 21, 1985, as (1) denied that branch of his motion which was for an order striking the defendants’ answer on the ground of willful deception and to impose sanctions against the defendants’ attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487, and (2) denied, without prejudice, that branch of his motion which was for leave to increase the ad damnum clause relating to the first cause of action in the complaint.
Order affirmed insofar as appealed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wiggin v. GordonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
- Goldner Trucking Corp. v. Stoll Packing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Lotz v. Albany Medical Center HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Shapiro v. FineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bernstein v. Oppenheim & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Izko Sportswear Co. v. FlaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Gonzalez v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Izko Sportswear Co. v. FlaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005