Legal Opinion

Lorberbaum v. Huff

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 2009No. A08-1407PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS, Judge.*

On appeal after remand, appellant-trustee challenges the district court’s determination that no damages were warranted for respondent-former-trustee’s exercise of discretionary powers prohibited by Minn. Stat. § 501B.14 (2008). Appellant also argues that the district court erred by (1) declining to take additional testimony on respondent’s failure to inform appellant of his duties as successor trustee, (2) not awarding him attorney fees levied against respondent personally, and (3) awarding trustee attorney fees to respondent. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Jack Margolis…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Matter of Trust Created by HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Marriage of Duffey v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Smith v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Margolis Revocable TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API