Lorberbaum v. Huff
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLLINS, Judge.*
On appeal after remand, appellant-trustee challenges the district court’s determination that no damages were warranted for respondent-former-trustee’s exercise of discretionary powers prohibited by Minn. Stat. § 501B.14 (2008). Appellant also argues that the district court erred by (1) declining to take additional testimony on respondent’s failure to inform appellant of his duties as successor trustee, (2) not awarding him attorney fees levied against respondent personally, and (3) awarding trustee attorney fees to respondent. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Jack Margolis…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of Trust Created by HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Marriage of Duffey v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Smith v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Margolis Revocable TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009