Legal Opinion

Powell v. City of Amarillo

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1936No. 6484PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Taylor

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

Suit was filed in the name of the City of Amarillo, Texas, for the use and benefit of United Fidelity Life Insurance Company against J. P. Burgess, Alta Burgess, J. M. Petty, Amarillo Construction Company and White & Kirk, Inc. The suit was upon a paving certificate owned by the company issued to Jordan Construction Company, and its purpose was to foreclose a paving lien against a lot in the city of Amarillo, alleged to be a first and superior lien securing its payment. C. M.

Powell intervened, suing upon a paving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hollenbeck v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Brownell Improvement Co. v. NixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Powell v. City of AmarilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estates of CarriganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Supreme Forest Woodmen Circle v. City of Belton, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Munoz Ex Rel. Martinez v. Cameron County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  4. Bankers Life Co. v. Breckenridge Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Special Assessment Securities Corp v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API