Legal Opinion

Shnier v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 17, 2020No. 18-1257Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1257 (Filed: 17 November 2020) *************************************** DAVID C. SHNIER & EVELYN Z. SHNIER, * * Plaintiffs, * * Pro Se; Tax Refund Claim; RCFC 56; v. * Motion for Summary Judgment; 26 I.R.C. * § 1297; Passive Foreign Investment THE UNITED STATES, * Company (“PFIC”); Taxpayer Bill of * Rights (“TBOR”); 26 I.R.C. § 7803(a)(3) Defendant, * * *************************************** David C. Shnier and Evelyn Z. Shnier, pro se, of Baltimore, MD, for plaintiffs. Miranda Bureau, Trial Attorney, with whom were Mary M. Abate, Assistant…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API