Legal Opinion
Drainage Dist. No. 2 of Crittenden County v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co. of St. Louis
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1934No. 9778PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas appointing receivers for drainage district No. 2 of Crittenden eoun*7» Ark-
The order was made upon the complaint and answer in a suit brought by the appellee, Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Com-panyj againsti the appellants.
The facts, which are largely undisputed, are substantially as follows: The drainage district was organized under the Arkansas Alternative Drainage System of 1909 (Acts *1391909, No. 279, p. 829), as amended in 1911 (Acts 1911, No. 221, p. 193) and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee Dist. v. KurnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Luehrmann v. Drainage Dist. No. 7 of Poinsett County, Ark.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- In Re Drainage Dist. No. 7 of Poinsett County, Ark.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1937
- Spellings v. DeweyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.