Legal Opinion

Beiter v. Beiter

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1970No. 375PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment appealed from is for a lump sum amount purportedly for unpaid and delinquent payments under an April 26, 1951 divorce decree which stated: “[It is ordered that] * * * defendant pay to the clerk of this court the sum of twenty five and no/100 ($25.-00) dollars per week by way of support, maintenance and alimony for the benefit of the plaintiff and the said minor children. Said payment is to continue until further order of the court and the court reserves the right to modify or change the amount of said weekly payments either with or without a hearing thereon.”

It was stipulated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schnierle v. SchnierleOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Bidinger v. BidingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. McCabe v. McCabeOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Metzger v. MetzgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Connin v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kinney v. MathiasOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rhoades v. RhoadesOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Tressler v. TresslerOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Crow v. CrowOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API