Legal Opinion

Hanford v. Codman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 30, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of contract, brought by the plaintiff as trustee in bankruptcy of J. Murray Quinby, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Quinby, Inc.), to recover for an alleged preference. The case was heard by a judge of the Superior' Court and a jury. After the plaintiff’s counsel had stated in his opening the facts which he intended to prove, the presiding judge, on the defendants’ motion and subject to the plaintiff’s exception, directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendants. The question presented is whether upon the record this direction was error.

The facts that the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Cook v. TullisSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Stewart v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Sawyer v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mason v. WyldeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Kamberg v. Springfield National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Comparone v. M. J. Caplan Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API