Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hanback v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1943No. 134Published

1DissentCayton, Associate Judge

Must the defendant suffer because the judges have failed to enact a procedural rule to fit his case ? Must he lose his right to be heard on appeal because the courts— the Municipal Court and this Court — have omitted to prescribe how a defendant in a misdemeanor case can manage-to stay out of jail while his appeal is pending?

There was such a rule, clear and definite, when these cases were tried in the old Police Court, and the review was by the United States Court of Appeals. Then the statute, Code 1940,' 17 — 103, provided that a defendant seeking a review of his conviction should enter into…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FlecknerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. United States ex rel. Carapa v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. Page v. People ex rel. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hartwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API