Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1911PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Violating Prohibition Law. Appeal from Geneva County Court. Heard before Hon. E. Foster Ellsberry. Noah Johnson was convicted of selling spirituous, vinous or malt liquors contrary to law, and he appeals. The facts here shown do not constitute a sale. — Coker v. State, 91 Ala. 92. The court should have admitted the fact that the defendant was working for the purchaser of the whiskey under a criminal contract.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

—

The defendant was indicted and convicted for selling spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors contrary to law.

The record shows a minute entry, reciting that upon •the verdict of the jury finding the defendant guilty, and assessing a fine of |50, the court “ordered and adjudged that the state of Alabama, for the use of Geneva county, have and recover of the defendant the sum of fifty dollars, the fine assessed by the jury, together with all the costs in this behalf expended, for which execution may issue.” .Immediately following this is the recital “Comes the defendant in open court and pays the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Town Council of Cahaba v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  2. Wilkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Ex parte Walter Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. State v. ConklingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. State v. WestfallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lopez v. KilligrewIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State v. WinthropWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. State v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Town of White Sulphur Springs v. VoiseMontana Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API