Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Kroeger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, New York County (Maresca, J.), entered March 11,1981, in a CPLR article 78 proceeding, reversed, on the law and the facts, the motion to quash the subpoena issued by respondent denied and the cross motion to direct compliance with the subpoena granted, all without costs. Dr. Harold S. Goldberg, the petitioner herein, is an osteopathic physician, duly authorized by the chairman of the Workers’ Compensation Board to treat injured workers entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. As a result of complaints received by the board, an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Dawn Operators, Inc. v. LyonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. In re the New York State Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Furlong v. New York State Workers' Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Investors Insurance Co. of America v. Karbel Wholesale Autos, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988
  3. Matter of Frid v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API