Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Insurance v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1934No. 23332, 23403PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

"We consider it necessary to elaborate upon the second headnote only. The plaintiff brought suit upon a policy of life insurance (in which she was named as beneficiary) issued to her husband. The policy was for the sum of $2500, but it contained the following provision: “If there further be received at said home office due proof that such death resulted directly from bodily injury received after the date of issue of this policy, independently and exclusively of all other causes, and that such bodily injury was effected solely through external, violent, and accidental means, and that such…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Harriman v. StoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Omberg v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  4. Atlanta Street Railroad v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Quaife v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Goldstein v. SklarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  3. Lathem v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Flemming v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API