Legal Opinion
McGuire v. City of Santa Fe
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided December 4, 1996No. Civil 95-995 BB/WWDPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S HEDONIC DAMAGE EXPERTS
BLACK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Patricia Murphy and John Myers on hedonic damages. The Court having read the briefs of counsel and taken evidence at a hearing on October 25, 1996, finds Defendants’ motion is well taken and should be GRANTED.
Plaintiff has submitted to Defendants the reports of two experts whom Plaintiff seeks to have testify regarding the value of the loss of enjoyment of life Plaintiff allegedly suffered as a result of Defendants’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Pedro N. Soto and Edwin F. GotayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Bell v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Montalvo v. LapezHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. Lealon MuldrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand, Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Lewis v. Alfa Laval Separation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Saia v. Sears Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Walker v. SpinaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Lough v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019