Board of Transportation v. Revis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CARLTON, Judge.
The sole question for determination is whether the trial court property admitted into evidence the purchase price of the property.
On cross-examination, one of the defendants testified, over objection of defendants’ counsel, that the purchase price of the property in 1969 was over $30,000 but less than $40,000. At the time of the ruling, the court advised that counsel for defendants would be permitted to reexamine the witness “on the phases” not covered in questions by counsel for plaintifff. Immediately following this testimony, counsel for defendants reexamined the witness and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Highway & Public Works Commission v. HartleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. CogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Palmer v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Redevelopment Commission of Winston-Salem v. HinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Winston-Salem v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983