Legal Opinion

Peterson v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1902No. 12,560PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court for Kearney county. Tried below before Adams, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Plaintiff in error, defendant below, was informed against, and by a jury found guilty of unlawfully keeping and having in his possession intoxicating liquors with the intention and for the purpose of selling and disposing of the same without having a license or permit to sell such liquors, contrary to the provisions of chapter. 50 of the Compthed Statutes. A motion for a new trial having been overruled, a sentence imposing a fine of $100 was duly imposed by the trial court, to secure a reversal of which the defendant prosecutes error proceeding in this court.

The information contains several…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Sahlinger v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Commonwealth v. GoodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. State v. BrunellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Robson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hyslop v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Benedict v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Steinkuhler v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cooper v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. MacDonald v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API