Legal Opinion

Harper v. Morris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1988No. 874SC769PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

It is well settled law in our state that when trees are unlawfully cut from the land of another, “claimant is entitled to either the difference in fair market value of the land before and after the cutting or the market value of the timber at the time and place of its severance plus incidental damages caused in removal, whichever he elects.” Simpson v. Lee, 26 N.C. App. 712, 715, 217 S.E. 2d 80, 82 (1975). Here the plaintiffs elected the diminished value measure, calculated by the difference in market value before and after the cutting.

Defendant contends the trial court erred by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diggs v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Simpson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vaught v. A.O. Hardee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Lee v. BirCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. King v. Duke Energy ProgressCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. King v. Duke Energy ProgressCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API